|
|
DYD B-11
|
|
 |
pUIZUmqlEoLvBxft |
 |
118 |
|
 |
| I'd like , please http://fittor.top/aam-chusne-hai/ tamilpundaisex Having said that, if porn qualifies under our right to freedom of expression, how can the state then limit that expression once bodily fluids get involved? Usually to limit a freedom there has to be a strong state interest. One could argue that the interest in not having a smut-saturated culture is such an interest, but the courts have rejected that argument. But then somehow, the state does have an interest in making sure people wear condoms when they have sex on camera if the video is going to be distributed for profit? This makes no sense to me. |
|
 |
Raymundo |
 |
2020-04-03 23:18:32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
