²É ºø»ì
vElTfiRVvMaTiXj 131
Could you please repeat that? http://fittor.fun/school-teacher-barnc-ke-niche-swx/ cxxxxx  The only answer to this scepticism is to have a robust judging process involving a panel of scientists who carry out through research into the work of candidates. Though there will always be disagreement, a prize will then gain credibility among the scientific community over time if it’s seen to weigh the claims of each nominee seriously by making its own enquiries.  Scientists will treat a prize whose winners are chosen for PR-reasons with scepticism.  But if a prize develops a track record of picking winners who go on to be widely celebrated, then it will be seen as performing a useful function.
Salvatore 2020-04-09 06:21:29

ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ | ã¾Æ¿À½Ã´Â ±æ | ÀÎÁõ³»¿ëº¸±â