|
|
적색스테인
|
|
 |
HtnYQSFnJTv |
 |
114 |
|
 |
| Would you like to leave a message? http://xvedio.in.net/ xvdios
This has all the makings of a disaster. Even if it is proven Assad and/or a top government approved the chemical attack, I have to question why the US/West must respond militarily. And this isn’t because I am squeamish about the use of military force or the initiation of a war. My issue is that military force should be a last resort. In this instance, it is apparently of the first resort. What about a total Western economic embargo of the Syrian government and the areas of Syria it still controls? What about freezing all Syrian assets in US/Western banks? These are certainly viable options and would likely have a greater impact on the Syrian government, and other nations which might consider the use of chemical weapons, that would a limited military strike. And the US/Western military response will have to be limited. But, perhaps, this is more about our longer term policy of supporting a regime change in Syria, and the alleged chemcial attack is the perfect excuse for advancing that policy. |
|
 |
Garfield |
 |
2019-06-22 11:16:43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
